|
| From: | Dmitry Gutov |
| Subject: | Re: PL support |
| Date: | Thu, 14 May 2020 16:41:32 +0300 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 14.05.2020 16:36, Stefan Monnier wrote:
- It would not impose our own coding conventions and would hence happily accept `s.el`.
Note: we most likely can ask s.el's author to better follow _some_ of our conventions, if that's what it takes to accept it for GNU ELPA.
But renaming the package (with 400+ dependencies out there) would be impractical.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |