[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: transient
|
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
|
Subject: |
RE: transient |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2020 15:04:52 -0700 |
Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:
> Icicles key completion is similar, but there are
> notable differences:
>
> 1. You can use it on-demand (as well as just
> automatically) - complete only when you want
> to, and without a delay.
What binding do you use here? Won't it conflict with other keybindings?
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, (continued)
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Arthur Miller, 2020/05/17
- transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/17
- Re: transient, Joost Kremers, 2020/05/18
- Re: transient, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/18
- Re: transient, Howard Melman, 2020/05/18
- Re: transient, John Yates, 2020/05/18
- Re: transient, Howard Melman, 2020/05/18
- RE: transient, Drew Adams, 2020/05/19
- Re: transient, Arthur Miller, 2020/05/19
- Re: transient, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/05/19
- RE: transient,
Stefan Kangas <=
- RE: transient, Drew Adams, 2020/05/19
- which-key, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/19
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Drew Adams, 2020/05/17
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Karl Fogel, 2020/05/20
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Drew Adams, 2020/05/20
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Karl Fogel, 2020/05/20
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/20
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, tomas, 2020/05/21
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Arthur Miller, 2020/05/21
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, tomas, 2020/05/21