Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 20.05.2020 16:32, João Távora wrote:
> Anyway, it is precisely in this sense that I try that Eglot
> provide the least amount of interactive commands and
> user options, and no keybindings at all.  So that people
> "see it" as little as possible of it.

The lack of a binging to show the doc (last time I tried) kind of hurts.

> They just see xref, project,
> flymake diagnostics, eldoc, etc. This is quite different
> from lsp-mode (at least the last time I looked at it).

IIUC, LSP also provides extra actions that tie into refactoring, 
reorganizing imports, etc. How does Eglot deal with it?

> Of
> course if major modes were in on the play, we could
> reduce the visibility of Eglot even more, maybe just
> reduce it to `eglot-connect` and `eglot-disconnect`, maybe
> call them `start-ide-ing` and `stop-ide-ing` for abstraction.

That sounds pointless. It's not like the users will look for 'M-x 
start-ide-ing' command specifically.