Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors

[João Távora]

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:14 PM Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 20.05.2020 17:10, João Távora wrote:
>
> >>> I agree that, if we want users to interact with it, "eglot" is a pretty
> >>> hard to understand name.  Perhaps "lsp-start" and "lsp-stop" would be
> >>> okay here, if that makes sense.
> >> So, what's your opinion on how lsp-mode would react to that particular
> >> rename, and how should we feel about that?
> >
> > Bahh... From Cassandra to Geraldo...
>  From semi-impolite to rude.

Aww, come on!  It's just that sometimes it seems you
just want to stir up controversy for no benefit.  Can't speak for
Stefan, but sounds he was expressing an idea I agree with:
LSP functionality could have that fact encoded in the name of
the associated command.

But OK we'll call it `M-x
not-that-lsp-the-package-the-other-one-the-protocol-itself-start`

:-)

João