Re: master f0b0105: Hoist some byte-code checking out of eval

[Paul Eggert]

On 5/20/20 4:21 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> My point is that 99% of the calls to `exec_byte_code` don't go through
> `Fbyte_code`.

Those other calls are also supposed to arrange for the relevant checks 
to be done, typically when the objects given to exec_byte_code were 
created. It saves some time to do the checks once on object creation 
rather than every time the byte code is called.

At least, that was the idea. Did I miss a path of execution that skips 
the checks?