[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs
From: |
Jeffrey Walton |
Subject: |
Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:58:44 -0400 |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:56 PM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 03 Aug 2020, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> >> Well, it is feature complete then.
> >>
> >> The same is true for most of the lightweight implementations in the
> >> list. Why would that be a problem?
>
> > "I do not recommend it use."
>
> *shrug* It compiles and works, and upstream appears to be responsive.
> No good reason for dropping it from a distro (and breaking existing
> users' workflows).
*shrug* The author told you not to use it. What don't you understand
about the statement?
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ulrich Mueller, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ulrich Mueller, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs,
Jeffrey Walton <=
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Gregory Heytings, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Amin Bandali, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Daniele Nicolodi, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Amin Bandali, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Daniele Nicolodi, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, andres . ramirez, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ergus, 2020/08/07