Re: named-let

[Andrea Corallo]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> As a side note I think we could have full TCO in Emacs, but at the cost
>> of a relatively invasive patch and a some (probably small but hard
>> to quantify a priori) performance regression.  Not sure it is
>> sufficiently important to justify that.
>
> That's the question, indeed.
> Also, I have the impression that "full TCO" could be difficult if we
> consider the mixed case where a compiled function calls an interpreted
> function and vice-versa.

I might be wrong but I think should be possible to harmonize both sides
with not much problems (other than the mentioned enormous codebase
diff).

But anyway, I've no time to prove I'm right or wrong on this :/

  Andrea