[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:17:57 +0200 |
> From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:41:39 -0800
>
> Eli has said he wants the bundled packages in the emacs worktree; I'd
> like to explore the specific rationale for that.
I explained that in the discussion we had back in December. See
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-12/msg00917.html
> Comments?
We had this discussion in December, and I think at least some aspects
were agreed upon; one of them is that using Git submodules is probably
the best alternative. Why don't we pick up where that discussion has
left off, instead of starting it all anew?
Thanks.
- policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/20
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Phillip Lord, 2021/01/21
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/22
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/23
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/24
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Phillip Lord, 2021/01/24
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25