Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball - take 2

[Stephen Leake]

Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk> writes:

> Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:
>
>> Attached is an updated version of emacs/admin/notes/elpa, describing a
>> proposal for bundling ELPA packages in the emacs distribution.
>>
>> I believe I have included all the recent discussions.
>>
>> I think I figured out a way to resolve the submodles vs worktrees
>> dilemma; each emacs developer can choose. If they don't execute any
>> submodule commands, they can use worktrees.
>
> That will be a significant help, actually. I presume that any build
> would be missing bundled packages? 

I don't follow.

If you mean "a build from an emacs directory tree", then it will have
whatever the developer checked out into that tree.

If they did "git clone <emacs> --recurse-submodules", then the build
will have the bundled packages.

If they left --recurse-submodules off the clone, but later did either:

    git submodule update --reference . --init

or:

    ./checkout_git_elpa_worktrees.sh

then the build will have the bundled packages.

The last option is indented for your Windows packaging workflow; it uses
git worktrees instead of submodules.

If they do neither of these options, the build will not have the bundled
packages.

> For me, this would not be a hassle because I'll just set it up so they
> install from ELPA on first use.

This is with your emacs user hat on, I guess. Yes, using a build from an
emacs directory tree without bundled packages would require getting
those packages via M-x list-packages (or equivalent).

> It would still break my windows packaging scripts which use worktrees,

It should not, as described above.

-- 
-- Stephe