[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rewriting make-docfile.c in Lisp?
From: |
Spencer Baugh |
Subject: |
Re: Rewriting make-docfile.c in Lisp? |
Date: |
Wed, 05 May 2021 14:39:18 -0400 |
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> Why would one want to write it in Lisp anyway?
>
> We have a working program in C which requires little maintenance, yet
> which is used continually. Rewriting it in Lisp would be _work_.
I was making a change and found it quite difficult. I think it would be
much simpler to change if it was in Lisp. I admit that since it's
rarely changed, it may not be worth it.
> Also, the Lisp version would run more slowly than the C version, leading
> to more irritation over build speeds than there currently is. I think
> this is also part of the build which holds things up in a single core,
> thus making its speed more important than, say, a C or Lisp compilation.
A rewrite in Lisp could also take the opportunity to add parallelization
and speed it up, if indeed this is a bottleneck for the build.
- Rewriting make-docfile.c in Lisp?, sbaugh, 2021/05/05
- Re: Rewriting make-docfile.c in Lisp?, Spencer Baugh, 2021/05/05
- Re: Rewriting make-docfile.c in Lisp?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/06
- Re: Rewriting make-docfile.c in Lisp?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/05
- Re: Rewriting make-docfile.c in Lisp?, Spencer Baugh, 2021/05/05