[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some native compiler related renaming
From: |
Andrea Corallo |
Subject: |
Re: Some native compiler related renaming |
Date: |
Tue, 11 May 2021 16:33:14 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 08:40:25 +0000
>>
>> Hi Eli & all,
>>
>> question: should we rename also `comp-deferred-compilation'? (and
>> possibly `comp-deferred-compilation-deny-list' too)?
>
> If we expect downstream distros to stick to the "no *.el files"
> policy, then yeah, I guess so. (I didn't include it in the list I
> posted a week ago because I thought no one in their right mind would
> want to disable native-compilation, except for debugging special
> situations.)
Not sure what downstream distros will stick to so I did the renaming.
Also the deny list is something that might be useful to some user, and
ATM we have all defcustoms in comp.el with the native- prefix (with the
exception of comp-libgccjit-reproducer that is really a debug thing).
Thanks
Andrea