[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b'
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b' |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:11:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't think the "prefix command" is vital to know, as the commands
> will be listed individually later. I say skip it.
>
> It would be good to fix "??", yes.
I've now done both of these, and it looks like an improvement to me --
the lists are a lot more "unified" now without the "Prefix Command"
bits.

vs in emacs-28:

--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', (continued)
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/01
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/01
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', T.V Raman, 2021/11/01
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/01
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b',
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Andreas Schwab, 2021/11/03
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Andreas Schwab, 2021/11/03
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Juri Linkov, 2021/11/04