[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tick Reduction
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Tick Reduction |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:17:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Except for when you want to say things like:
>
> This "frobnicates" the turbo encabulator.
>
> IOW, where the thing in quotes are just regular words. I'm positive we
> have such cases, but I can't remember where.
We probably have, but it's pretty rare. (Mostly because people don't
like typing \" all over the place, I think.)
>> I think going full Org in the doc strings would be excessive -- it's
>> pretty easy to detect Emacs Lisp.
>
> Yes, it must be slimmed down to its absolute bare essentials. IOW, we
> should consider only those parts that we see a need for.
>
> BTW, Markdown has a nice way to mark monospace blocks, if we want to
> avoid relying on heuristics or simply provide a fire-escape if it fails:
>
> ```
> like this
> ```
>
> Although it is far less powerful than what Org-mode does, it is also
> much simpler and less noisy.
Yup. We currently use \ as the escape character (with \\< and \\[ and
\\=), so we could continue to use that:
\\*
like this
\\*
Or something. On the other hand, \\ is really kinda ugly.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Tick Reduction, (continued)
- Re: Tick Reduction, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Eric S Fraga, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/19
- Re: Tick Reduction, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/20