[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions
From: |
Trey |
Subject: |
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Apr 2022 21:50:14 +0000 |
Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> Morgan Smith <morgan.j.smith@outlook.com> writes:
>
>> I'd like to report that my super key stopped registering. I suspected
>> commit 1404e16975 caused it so I did a quick `git revert 1404e16975`
>> ontop of 807682de1e and that fixed it.
>
> Crystal ball says you are using X Windows, and have to put
>
> remove mod4 = Hyper_L
>
> in your ~/.Xmodmap file, because GTK doesn't try as hard as regular X11
> Emacs to work around the common kind of virtual modifier
> misconfiguration.
>
I'm experiencing the same issue here. My super key no longer registers,
even using emacs -Q. However, I find it begins from the commit changing
to GDK modifier masks 1c1ae6ba802cc5813fa6f8f90f21050aae6bb459. I've
tested this with the following specs:
WMs: River & Sway
Emacs Version: Emacs 29.0.50 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version
3.24.33, cairo version 1.17.6) of 2022-04-18
--
Trey
publickey - gpg@treypeacock.com - da008078.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, (continued)
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Dirk-Jan C. Binnema, 2022/04/19
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Yuri Khan, 2022/04/19
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Pankaj Jangid, 2022/04/22
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions,
Trey <=
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/04/19
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/20
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Trey Peacock, 2022/04/20