[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comparing hash table objects
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Comparing hash table objects |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:45:20 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
It clearly can be useful to compare hash tables for equivalence
of contents. I see two ways to offer that facility:
* As a new function. That would be upward-compatible.
* By making `equal' compare them that way. That would fit the spirit
of `equal', but could break some existing uses of `equal'.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Comparing hash table objects, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/08
- Re: Comparing hash table objects, Andreas Schwab, 2022/06/08
- Re: Comparing hash table objects, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/08
- Re: Comparing hash table objects,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Comparing hash table objects, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/11
- Re: Comparing hash table objects, Stefan Monnier, 2022/06/11
- Re: Comparing hash table objects, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/12
- Re: Comparing hash table objects, Sam Steingold, 2022/06/12
- Re: Comparing hash table objects, Stefan Monnier, 2022/06/13
- Re: Comparing hash table objects, Sam Steingold, 2022/06/13