[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Deleting functions and variables obsolete since 24.1--24.3
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Deleting functions and variables obsolete since 24.1--24.3 |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2022 20:20:21 -0700 |
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
> diff --git a/lisp/proced.el b/lisp/proced.el
> index a27638d367..29e2860fba 100644
> --- a/lisp/proced.el
> +++ b/lisp/proced.el
> @@ -1768,6 +1768,8 @@ proced-with-processes-buffer
> (save-window-excursion
> ;; Analogous to `dired-pop-to-buffer'
> ;; Don't split window horizontally. (Bug#1806)
> + ;; FIXME: `dired-pop-to-buffer' was removed. Should we just
> + ;; use `pop-to-buffer' here also?
> (display-buffer (current-buffer)
> '(display-buffer-in-direction
> (direction . bottom)
>
> But the obsolesce message in etc/NEWS.24 informs:
>
> ** The following functions and variables are obsolete:
> *** 'dired-pop-to-buffer' (use 'dired-mark-pop-up')
>
> So the replacement is 'dired-mark-pop-up' rather than `pop-to-buffer'.
Hmm, not sure what the fix is here. Would it be enough to just update
the FIXME?
diff --git a/lisp/proced.el b/lisp/proced.el
index 29e2860fba..a176ebcf91 100644
--- a/lisp/proced.el
+++ b/lisp/proced.el
@@ -1768,8 +1768,8 @@ proced-with-processes-buffer
(save-window-excursion
;; Analogous to `dired-pop-to-buffer'
;; Don't split window horizontally. (Bug#1806)
- ;; FIXME: `dired-pop-to-buffer' was removed. Should we just
- ;; use `pop-to-buffer' here also?
+ ;; FIXME: `dired-pop-to-buffer' was removed and replaced with
+ ;; `dired-mark-pop-up'.
(display-buffer (current-buffer)
'(display-buffer-in-direction
(direction . bottom)