[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs git repo mangled
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs git repo mangled |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2022 05:26:35 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 19:41:41 +0000
> From: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
> cc: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> > Wouldn't his mean that all other commits prior the eglot merge would be
> > regarded as "good", when bisecting? I doubt this is what we want.
> >
>
> No, it means that all commits between Eglot's root (1e5b753bf4) and
> Eglot's merge (0186faf2a1), except Eglot's merge itself, are regarded as
> "good". IOW, git bisect will never "descend" into Eglot's branch, and
> only into that branch, which is exactly what we want.
IMO, this interpretation should be in the comments inside the script.
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, (continued)
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/11/02
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/02
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/02
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Phil Sainty, 2022/11/02
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/02
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/02
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/02
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Michael Albinus, 2022/11/05
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Gregory Heytings, 2022/11/05
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Phil Sainty, 2022/11/01
- Re: Emacs git repo mangled, Robert Pluim, 2022/11/02