[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!
From: |
Akib Azmain Turja |
Subject: |
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages! |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:20:11 +0600 |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> Akib Azmain Turja <akib@disroot.org> writes:
>
>> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>>
>>>>> OK, then adding them to NonGNU ELPA seems like the safer bet.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to add them, but I'll have to take the time to review them
>>>>> first, which might take a bit.
>>>>
>>>> What do you want to review? The patches, or the packages?
>>>
>>> The packages, unless you aren't interested in comments.
>>
>> Review if you wish, I welcome feedback.
>
> I've managed to skim through workroom.el. The code looks great, so I
> just have a non-comprehensive list of comments and ideas:
Really? It was one of my worst packages until I almost rewrote it over
the last few weeks.
>
> diff --git a/workroom.el b/workroom.el
> index 7091645b85..8bb564e495 100644
> --- a/workroom.el
> +++ b/workroom.el
> @@ -217,12 +217,13 @@ The value is a mode line terminal like
> `mode-line-format'."
> keymap)
> "Keymap containing all useful commands of Workroom.")
>
> -(defvar workroom-mode-map (make-sparse-keymap)
> +(defvar workroom-mode-map
> + (let ((map (make-sparse-keymap)))
> + (define-key map workroom-command-map-prefix
> + workroom-command-map)
> + map)
> "Keymap for Workroom mode.")
>
> -(define-key workroom-mode-map workroom-command-map-prefix
> - workroom-command-map)
> -
I just removed that define-key completely. `workroom-mode` will bind it
when enabled.
> (defun workroom-rebind-command-map-prefix ()
> "Rebind command prefix key sequence `workroom-command-map-prefix'."
> (substitute-key-definition
> @@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ The value is a mode line terminal like
> `mode-line-format'."
> ;;;; Workroom and View Manipulation.
>
> (cl-defstruct (workroom--room
> + (:predicate workroomp)
> (:constructor workroom--make-room)
> (:copier workroom--copy-room))
> "Structure for workroom."
> @@ -253,6 +255,7 @@ The value is a mode line terminal like
> `mode-line-format'."
> :documentation "`completing-read' history of view names."))
>
> (cl-defstruct (workroom--view
> + (:predicate workroom-view-p)
> (:constructor workroom--make-view)
> (:copier workroom--copy-view))
> "Structure for view of workroom."
> @@ -268,7 +271,7 @@ The value is a mode line terminal like
> `mode-line-format'."
> (defvar workroom--dont-clear-new-view nil
> "Non-nil mean don't clear empty new views.")
They don't get a docstring on my machine. :(
>
> -(defvar workroom--rooms nil
> +(defvar workroom--rooms nil ;maybe some comments on the structure
> "List of currently live workrooms.")
As the docstring describes, it's a list, and all elements satisfies
`workroomp'.
>
> (defvar workroom-room-history nil
> @@ -283,10 +286,6 @@ that.")
>
> (defvar workroom-mode)
>
> -(defun workroomp (object)
> - "Return non-nil if OBJECT is a workroom object."
> - (workroom--room-p object))
> -
> (defun workroom-name (room)
> "Return the name of workroom ROOM."
> (workroom--room-name room))
> @@ -384,10 +383,6 @@ effect, it is not unaltered."
> "Completing read history of view of workroom ROOM."
> (workroom--room-view-history room))
>
> -(defun workroom-view-p (object)
> - "Return non-nil if OBJECT is a view object."
> - (workroom--view-p object))
> -
I just wanted to give it a better docstring. ;)
> (defun workroom-view-name (view)
> "Return the name of view VIEW."
> (workroom--view-name view))
> @@ -435,10 +430,9 @@ A copy is returned, so it can be modified with
> side-effects."
> "Return the workroom named NAME.
>
> If no such workroom exists, return nil."
> - (catch 'found
> - (dolist (room workroom--rooms nil)
> - (when (string= name (workroom-name room))
> - (throw 'found room)))))
> + (cl-find name workroom--rooms
> + :key #'workroom-name
> + :test #'string=))
Done, also changed workroom-view-get.
>
> (defun workroom-get-create (name)
> "Return the workroom named NAME.
> @@ -500,7 +494,7 @@ If no such view exists, create a new one named NAME and
> return that."
> (unless view
> (setq view (workroom--make-view :name name))
> (setf (workroom--room-view-list room)
> - (nconc (workroom--room-view-list room) `(,view))))
> + (nconc (workroom--room-view-list room) (list view))))
> view))
Done.
>
> (defun workroom-generate-new-view-name (room name)
> @@ -516,7 +510,7 @@ name."
> (let ((n 2))
> (while t
> (let ((str (format "%s<%i>" name n)))
> - (when (not (workroom-view-get room str))
> + (unless (workroom-view-get room str)
> (cl-return str))
> (cl-incf n)))))))
I can't believe I wrote (when (not ...) ...)!
>
> @@ -558,7 +552,7 @@ Return DEF when input is empty, where DEF is either a
> string or nil.
>
> REQUIRE-MATCH and PREDICATE is same as in `completing-read'."
> (completing-read
> - (concat prompt (when def (format " (default %s)" def)) ": ")
> + (concat prompt (and def (format " (default %s)" def)) ": ") ;Compat has
> `format-prompt'
> (mapcar #'workroom-name workroom--rooms) predicate require-match
> nil 'workroom-room-history def))
I don't have much idea about Compat, how does it work?
>
> @@ -670,7 +664,7 @@ If WRITABLE, return a writable object."
> (defun workroom--load-window-config (state)
> "Load window configuration STATE."
> (if state
> - (cl-labels
> + (cl-labels ;perhaps this should be split up?
> ((sanitize (entry)
> (cond
> ;; Do nothing.
Yeah, it's too monolithic.
> @@ -1254,7 +1248,7 @@ ACTION and ARGS are also described there."
> (setf (workroom-buffer-manager-data room)
> (cl-delete-if-not #'buffer-live-p
> (workroom-buffer-manager-data room)))
> - (pcase action
> + (pcase action ;perhaps match on (cons action
> args)?
> (:initialize
> (cl-destructuring-bind () args
> (setf (workroom-buffer-manager-data room)
I wonder why I used cl-destructuring-bind when there isn't any keyword
arguments.
Fixing...
Fixing...done
> @@ -1507,9 +1501,14 @@ restrict."
>
> (defun workroom--encode-view-1 (view)
> "Encode view VIEW to a writable object."
> - `( :name ,(workroom-view-name view)
> - :window-config ,(workroom-view-window-configuration
> - view 'writable)))
> + ;; I think it is preferable to define plists with keywords using
> + ;; `list', as all the members of the list can be evaluated during
> + ;; application.
> + (list :name
> + (workroom-view-name view)
> + :window-config
> + (workroom-view-window-configuration
> + view 'writable)))
>
Done. Maybe I did too much.
> (defun workroom--decode-view-1 (object)
> "Decode encoded view OBJECT to a view."
> @@ -1589,7 +1588,7 @@ when ROOM was encoded."
>
> (defun workroom-decode-buffer-bookmark (object)
> "Decode OBJECT using `bookmark-jump'."
> - (let* ((buffer nil))
> + (let ((buffer nil))
> (bookmark-jump object (lambda (buf) (setq buffer buf)))
> buffer))
>
> @@ -1664,7 +1663,7 @@ any previous bookmark with the same name."
> bookmark)))))
> (pcase (plist-get data :version)
> (1
> - (let* ((buffers (cl-delete-if
> + (let ((buffers (cl-delete-if
> #'null
> (workroom--decode-buffers
> (plist-get data :buffers)))))
Ah, I wasted two bytes for each copy of Workroom worldwide. :(
Fixed.
> @@ -1787,6 +1786,7 @@ any previous bookmark with the same name."
> ;; Inject restoring code.
> (when workroom-mode
> (let ((time (format-time-string "%s%N")))
> + ;; I like to use `prin1-to-string' for things like these.
> (insert
> (format
> "
Done, and I got syntax highlighting as a bonus!
> @@ -1951,6 +1951,7 @@ argument while setting as the buffer manager, PROJECT,
> the project."
> (defun workroom--project-name (project)
> "Return a name for project PROJECT."
> (let ((root (project-root project)))
> + ;; Isn't this `file-name-base' or `directory-file-name'?
> (if (string-match "/\\([^/]+\\)/?\\'" root)
> (match-string 1 root)
> root)))
>
Yeah, my bad, it's actually `file-name-base'. I threw the function
away.
--
Akib Azmain Turja, GPG key: 70018CE5819F17A3BBA666AFE74F0EFA922AE7F5
Fediverse: akib@hostux.social
Codeberg: akib
emailselfdefense.fsf.org | "Nothing can be secure without encryption."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/15
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/16
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/16
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/16
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/16
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/17
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/21
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!,
Akib Azmain Turja <=
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/22
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/22
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/25
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/22
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/25
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/25
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/25
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/25