[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging use-package before Emacs 29, hopefully
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Merging use-package before Emacs 29, hopefully |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 2022 01:05:57 -0800 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> 2. I didn't mark trivial commits with "Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes".
>> Using the scripts from João and Payas, it will be trivial to add, if
>> I can get access to a list of the relevant commits.
>>
>> - Do we care strongly about this?
>
> Yes, we do.
>
>> - If yes, do we have a list of commits that need such marking? Or,
>> equivalently, the authors whose work we don't need assignments for?
>
> I hope John can answer that. Truth be told, this should have been taken
> care of before pushing the scratch branch to the Emacs repository.
>
>> 3. The mailmap.txt file may or may not need looking over. For example,
>> I'm not sure how important it is that the emails line up with the
>> copyright assignments file.
>
> It is pretty important, so if there are significant discrepancies, we'd need
> that incorporated.
Thanks, I have emailed you privately about the above.
>> 5. I added the files README.md as admin/USE-PACKAGE.README and NEWS.md
>> as etc/USE-PACKAGE-NEWS. We might want to just skip these files
>> though, as they don't add much. They are available in the old
>> repository if anyone should need to take a look at them.
>
> Why do we need the README? Ideally, it should be incorporated into the
> manual, and then discarded.
Yup, so let's just skip it. All relevant information from README.md
will be in the texinfo manual.
> As for USE-PACKAGE.NEWS, unless we are going to keep updating it, I would
> omit it as well. If you "git rm" it, it will be in Git history if someone
> needs it.
Sounds good.