[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release branch emacs-29
From: |
Akib Azmain Turja |
Subject: |
Re: Release branch emacs-29 |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:44:07 +0600 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Akib Azmain Turja <akib@disroot.org>
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:26:46 +0600
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > From now on please install bug fixes to the emacs-29 branch (they will be
>> > merged to master soon enough), while new features and improvements in
>> > existing features should be installed on master.
>>
>> Is it possible to alias terminal "eat" to "xterm" in 'term-file-aliases'
>> in Emacs 29?
>
> I don't know what this would mean, so I cannot make up my mind. Is it
> indeed the same as xterm?
Nope, but similar. XTerm compatibility hasn't been achieved, yet.
>
>> It'll be nice to have a dedicated "term/eat.el" with all XTerm features
>> enabled (xterm-extra-capabilities), but I think it'd be better to add
>> this to Emacs 30.
>
> It is definitely an easier decision to add that on master. But still, it
> would be best to hear the reasons why you think this is a valid alias.
Because it allows to get all the XTerm benefits (like extra keybindings,
clipboard) in Eat. And if you don't know what's Eat, it's a terminal
emulator package I wrote.
I have "eat" aliased to "xterm" so a month or two in my init file, and
it works fine on my Emacs.
But, Stefan Monnier suggested that including term/eat.el in my package
would also work. So I think I should try that first, since the people
using Emacs in Eat would probably have Eat installed, am I right?
--
Akib Azmain Turja, GPG key: 70018CE5819F17A3BBA666AFE74F0EFA922AE7F5
Fediverse: akib@hostux.social
Codeberg: akib
emailselfdefense.fsf.org | "Nothing can be secure without encryption."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Release branch emacs-29, (continued)