[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package "luwak"
From: |
T.V Raman |
Subject: |
Re: Package "luwak" |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:49:39 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
1+.
As a likely potential user, I looked at that package and didn't see
anything there that would improve EWW after a quick review;
More generally, could we have some kind of code review and code quality
check by a few folks in general before adding a package --- taking a
package out tends to have more friction than putting something in over
the long term.
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > My hope is that this package will disappear (merged with eww.el), so
> > I think it's OK it stays somewhat obscure until then.
>
> Ok, if it does get mered and disappear.
> Could we make a decision to revisit the name in April
> if it does NOT disappear by then?
--
Thanks,
--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
?7?4 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 ?0?8
- Re: Package "luwak", Richard Stallman, 2022/12/02
- Re: Package "luwak",
T.V Raman <=
- Re: Package "luwak", Will Mengarini, 2022/12/04
- Re: Package "luwak", Jean Louis, 2022/12/04
- Re: Package "luwak", Richard Stallman, 2022/12/05
- Re: Package "luwak", Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/06
- Re: Package "luwak", Richard Stallman, 2022/12/06
- Re: Package "luwak", Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/06
- Re: Package "luwak", Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/07
- Re: Package "luwak", Andreas Schwab, 2022/12/07
Re: Package "luwak", Yuchen Pei, 2022/12/10