[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29 |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2022 17:19:25 -0800 |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> That does make sense, but I believe to have had found instances where
> this was not the case. I'll try and see if I can locate those again.
That will be appreciated, thanks.
> Also, this ties into the other point about the usage of @file.
> Shouldn't the first case be wrapped in @file?
I don't think we do that elsewhere, do we? See e.g. eshell.texi or
eglot.texi.
My understanding is that it's "use-package" when referring to the
package as a whole, "@file{use-package}" when referring to the library
(i.e. use-package.el), and "@code{use-package}" when referring to the
macro by that name.
- Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, (continued)
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/09
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/09
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Stefan Kangas, 2022/12/10
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/11
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29,
Stefan Kangas <=
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/12
Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29, Payas Relekar, 2022/12/08