[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tree-sitter doc question
From: |
Fraga, Eric |
Subject: |
Re: Tree-sitter doc question |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:19:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Monday, 12 Dec 2022 at 13:20, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> Really?
> Ah, yes, I used the wrong links, sorry, but my point still stands:
bookworm is "testing", not stable; stable is bullseye.
Yes, I could move to testing but I won't as stability is more important
(for me). As I said in my original response, I'm happy to wait.
--
Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2022-12-02) on Debian 11.5
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, (continued)
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Juanma Barranquero, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Óscar Fuentes, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Tim Cross, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, João Paulo Labegalini de Carvalho, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question, Tim Cross, 2022/12/12
- Re: Tree-sitter doc question,
Fraga, Eric <=