[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cl-lib warnings
From: |
Tomas Hlavaty |
Subject: |
Re: cl-lib warnings |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2022 20:13:59 +0100 |
On Sat 24 Dec 2022 at 15:39, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's a package for Common Lisp that implements an iter construct that
> is, basically, the whole CL `loop' but with a more lispy syntax.
iterate is a bad idea
use the simplest lisp construct for the problem at hand instead
- Re: cl-lib warnings, (continued)
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/22
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/22
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/23
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/23
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Juanma Barranquero, 2022/12/23
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/24
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Juanma Barranquero, 2022/12/24
- Re: cl-lib warnings,
Tomas Hlavaty <=
- Re: cl-lib warnings, João Távora, 2022/12/23
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/24
- Re: cl-lib warnings, João Távora, 2022/12/24
- cl-loop and plists vs alists, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/25
- Re: cl-loop and plists vs alists, João Távora, 2022/12/25
- Re: cl-loop and plists vs alists, Bob Rogers, 2022/12/26
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Sean Whitton, 2022/12/24
- Re: cl-lib warnings, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/24
- package-initialize was Re: cl-lib warnings, T.V Raman, 2022/12/24
- Re: package-initialize was Re: cl-lib warnings, T.V Raman, 2022/12/24