[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [elpa] externals/denote 51bd02b95c 1/2: Add initial version of 'deno
From: |
Ruijie Yu |
Subject: |
Re: [elpa] externals/denote 51bd02b95c 1/2: Add initial version of 'denote-rename-buffer' extension |
Date: |
Sun, 28 May 2023 16:39:47 +0800 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.9.22; emacs 30.0.50 |
ELPA Syncer <elpasync@gnu.org> writes:
> diff --git a/denote-rename-buffer.el b/denote-rename-buffer.el
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..3582f33e9b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/denote-rename-buffer.el
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +;;; denote-rename-buffer.el --- Rename Denote buffers to be shorter and
> easier to read -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
> +
> +;; Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> +;; Author: Protesilaos Stavrou <info@protesilaos.com>
> +;; Maintainer: Denote Development <~protesilaos/denote@lists.sr.ht>
> +;; URL: https://git.sr.ht/~protesilaos/denote
> +;; Mailing-List: https://lists.sr.ht/~protesilaos/denote
> +
> +;; This file is NOT part of GNU Emacs.
I'm curious, should GNU elpa packages be considered part of Emacs or
not? I have previously contributed to pyim, a GNU elpa package, whose
maintainer asked me whether I had FSF CA before including my proposed
changes, and whose package header says it is part of Emacs.
--
Best,
RY
- Re: [elpa] externals/denote 51bd02b95c 1/2: Add initial version of 'denote-rename-buffer' extension,
Ruijie Yu <=