[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:08:45 +0200 |
14 juli 2023 kl. 10.00 skrev Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>:
> It would be nice if the backtraces used `pp' instead of dumb truncation.
> Though would make things much, much more readable.
Not necessarily as it also means that uninteresting data takes up much more
space.
Better have a way to expand and pretty-print individual stack frames on demand
in the backtrace buffer.
> Of course, the `condition-case' created by ERT will still be an issue.
Yes, and that was probably what really caused Alan's troubles. We could do
something about that.
- The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/13
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/14
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Mattias Engdegård, 2023/07/17
- Re: The poor quality of Emacs's backtraces, Alan Mackenzie, 2023/07/17