Re: [External] : Re: Question about native compilation (bug?)

[Andrea Corallo]

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

>> Redefining a primitive (thing that is not recommended but often done)
>> one must at least use the same signature as the original one.  I don't
>> think we support the case where the new definition is of a different
>> signature.  Native compilation might be just more sensitive in this
>> unsupported condition.
>
> I don't know whether the same problem arises if
> the redefined function has a Lisp instead of a
> C definition.  If not, then what you say might
> have a bit more sway.

Should be only about primitives (C definitions).

  Andrea