[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Understanding filter function calls
From: |
Karthik Chikmagalur |
Subject: |
Re: Understanding filter function calls |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jul 2023 14:44:21 -0700 |
> It does not take any longer for the filter function to run on each
> invocation. The problem is that The filter in Emacs is called with
> about 4KB of new text every time, and these calls are spaced out evenly
> in time, so Emacs takes longer to get around to parsing the stdout with
> TeXLive 2023.
>
> The dvisvgm process is thus bottlenecked by Emacs. I can imagine a few
> different ways to fix this, but I don't know how to do them:
I can confirm this after some benchmarking:
| dvisvgm version | Run in shell (s) | Run via Emacs (s) | Difference |
|-----------------+------------------+-------------------+------------|
| TeXLive 2022 | 1.427 | 1.786 | 25% |
| TeXLive 2023 | 1.481 | 2.202 | 48% |
The variances are small and have been omitted. So TeXLive 2023's
dvisvgm is about 48% slower when called from Emacs because it's waiting
on Emacs to pick up the process output. Using a larger stream buffer
(if possible) should fix this issue.
Karthik
- Understanding filter function calls, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2023/07/24
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Jens Schmidt, 2023/07/24
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2023/07/27
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/28
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2023/07/28
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/29
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2023/07/29
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/30
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/28
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2023/07/28
- Re: Understanding filter function calls, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/29