Re: seq.el and the complexity of Emacs Lisp.

[Gerd Möllmann]

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

Can't say much about what you write before this. I wasn't there when
seq/map, pcase, or other stuff, was added, but...

> Could we replace all the cl-lib sequence function calls with seq-
> calls, in core and GNU ELPA code?  Seq is simpler and cleaner, so that
> would be an improvement.  We could keep cl-lib permanently for
> compatibility for external code, but it would not need to be loaded
> (into Emacs or your brain) very often.

...you are loosing me here. I'm still wondering what seq/map are good
for in the first place. Considering something "cleaner" is just a
feeling, isn't it? A feeling I don't share.