Re: seq.el and the complexity of Emacs Lisp.

[Ihor Radchenko]

Harald Judt <h.judt@gmx.at> writes:

> My response was targeted more at the general denial to code changes, not 
> about 
> this discussion about cl-lib. Your assumption that every change needs to be 
> driven by benefit seems a bit short-sighted to me. It is probably good enough 
> when you want to build something fast without having to care about it much 
> later. Maybe it holds when you lack time because then not wasting time is a 
> priority. But if you want to build something for long-term use, it might not 
> be an optimal solution. Having to depend on immediate benefits to change 
> anything also loses importance when time is not that much of a priority.

AFAIU, Eli's position in the past was exactly as Emanuel described - we
do not change things unless there is a clear benefit of such change.

Eli, please correct me if my understanding is wrong.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>