[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?
|
From: |
Alex Corcoles |
|
Subject: |
Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 08 Nov 2023 21:16:58 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.40.4 (3.40.4-9.el9) |
On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 12:00 -0500, emacs-devel-request@gnu.org wrote:
> From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
> Message-ID: <87edh0k2jf.fsf@dataswamp.org>
> Cosmopolitan Libc makes C a build-once run-anywhere
> language, like Java, except it doesn't need an interpreter
> or virtual machine. [1]
> Sounds interesting!
> I wonder how they do that?
If I understand correctly, they found a way to make something that fits
all executable formats that major OSs support, plus they embed a zip
with binaries and dependencies (e.g. parts of /usr/ for Emacs), plus
they even convinced the POSIX stewards to loosen up the definition of
what's an executable. Plus a new libc...
> > Even though Cosmopolitan can be considered controversial
>
> Why is it controversial?
I'm not entirely sure their means to achieve their objectives are
"clean". Also, it's yet another libc. Some people I've discussed the
idea with were a bit hostile towards it.
Cheers,
Álex
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, (continued)
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/08
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Björn Bidar, 2023/11/08
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Alex Corcoles, 2023/11/08
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Po Lu, 2023/11/08
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/09
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Po Lu, 2023/11/09
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/09
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Alex Corcoles, 2023/11/09
Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Richard Stallman, 2023/11/08
Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?,
Alex Corcoles <=