[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 09 Nov 2023 21:52:12 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> If I understand correctly, they found a way to make something that fits
> all executable formats that major OSs support, plus they embed a zip
> with binaries and dependencies (e.g. parts of /usr/ for Emacs), plus
> they even convinced the POSIX stewards to loosen up the definition of
> what's an executable. Plus a new libc...
Could you possibly explain concretely what "a new libc" means in
this context? In what sense is it "new"? In what ways is it
different from the existing libc that any POSIX system would have?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, (continued)
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Björn Bidar, 2023/11/08
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Alex Corcoles, 2023/11/08
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Po Lu, 2023/11/08
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/09
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Po Lu, 2023/11/09
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/09
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Alex Corcoles, 2023/11/09
Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Richard Stallman, 2023/11/08
Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?, Alex Corcoles, 2023/11/08
- Re: Interest in a Cosmopolitan build?,
Richard Stallman <=