[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instead of pcase
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Instead of pcase |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Nov 2023 15:21:09 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:
> Bottom line, not using advanced libraries and instead rely on
> some basic building block Elisp is a total bogus idea, sorry.
That's merely your inference, so long as "advanced libraries" refers to
pcase. I don't expect anything short of obstinately maintaining that
it's true from you, but bear in mind that many others disagree, and,
above all, the subject at hand is the design of a construct that enables
pcase to be replaced without forsaking conciseness. A new construct.
Not constraining ourselves to "some basic building block Elisp."
With these conversations the game is frequently not worth the candle,
because of bitter but inane comments like yours.
- Re: Instead of pcase, (continued)
- Re: Instead of pcase, Emanuel Berg, 2023/11/16
- Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/16
- Re: Instead of pcase, Emanuel Berg, 2023/11/17
- Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/17
- Re: Instead of pcase, Emanuel Berg, 2023/11/17
- Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/17
- Re: Instead of pcase, Emanuel Berg, 2023/11/18
- Re: Instead of pcase,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/18