[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instead of pcase
|
From: |
Po Lu |
|
Subject: |
Re: Instead of pcase |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 Nov 2023 22:41:27 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> writes:
> OTOH, enacting a ban on particular abstractions will just about
> guarantee that certain kinds of features will not be implemented.
Not true. Maybe some individuals will be thus disinclined to, but even
that's up for debate.
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., (continued)
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Daniel Semyonov, 2023/11/23
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Richard Stallman, 2023/11/24
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Stefan Monnier, 2023/11/25
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Richard Stallman, 2023/11/26
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Richard Stallman, 2023/11/26
Re: Instead of pcase, Jim Porter, 2023/11/16
- Re: Instead of pcase, Po Lu, 2023/11/17
- Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/19
- Re: Instead of pcase, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/11/19
- Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/19
- Re: Instead of pcase, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/11/19
- Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/19
- Re: Instead of pcase, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/11/19
- Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/19
Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/11/20
Re: Instead of pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/11/19