[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond*
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: cond* |
|
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jan 2024 23:31:38 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Now I understand what (let REF RX-EXPR...) does, Thanks.
It seems like a gratuitous complexity for this aspect of `rx' to be
different between use in pcase and use as a Lisp function.
What Emacs really implements in search is numbered groups.
So that was the easiest thing to implement in `rx'.
But if it is possible to implement the named variables for thisin
pcase, surely they can be implemented in `rx' too.
How about if we add them to `rx'? WDYT?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: cond*, (continued)
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/13
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/14
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/08
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/26
Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/03
- Re: cond*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/06
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/08
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/26
Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02