[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?
|
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
|
Subject: |
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 7 Jan 2024 09:52:42 -0800 |
Daniel Mendler via "Emacs development discussions."
<emacs-devel@gnu.org> writes:
> Also, recently there has also been a
> discussion to add a `bicep-ts-mode' to Emacs core, with the argument
> being that VSCode supports it. Makes sense, it is a Microsoft product to
> help using Microsoft products. The description of Bicep on Github
> (https://github.com/Azure/bicep) is "Bicep is a declarative language for
> describing and deploying Azure resources". Does Bicep really need to be
> part of Emacs core? Couldn't it be added to ELPA instead?
I think we should be sympathetic to arguments such as the above, yes,
but why not ask this question in the Bicep thread instead? :-)
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, (continued)
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Dmitry, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/08
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/08
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Po Lu, 2024/01/07
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Daniel Mendler, 2024/01/07
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Daniel Mendler, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Daniel Mendler, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Daniel Mendler, 2024/01/07
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/07
Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/07