[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond*
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: cond* |
|
Date: |
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 22:47:23 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> May you please elaborate how you see named variables in `rx'?
Exactly the same as in `rx' in pcase.
I suppose pcase transforms the (rx ...) construct into a regular
expression -- right? If this can be implemented for the (rx ...)
pattern in pcase, it can be implemented for `rx' the function with the
same code -- right?
I expect it would work by allocating a subpattern number for each
(let ...) variable.
Please don't tell me that someone reimplemented `rx' from scratch
for pcase, rather than using the existing `rx' code!
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: cond*, (continued)
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/08
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/26
Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/03
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/05
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/06
- Re: cond*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/08
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/26
Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02