[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:47:02 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:03:00 -0800
> Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org
>
> Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> writes:
>
> > etc-fstab-generic-mode starts to get used if I (require 'generic-x),
> > however.
>
> IIUC, that's the expected behaviour.
Yes. We don't activate modes in generic-x.el unless the user
explicitly loads it.
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, (continued)
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/09
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/09
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/09
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/10
- Modes in generic-x.el (was: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?), Peter Oliver, 2024/01/10
- Re: Modes in generic-x.el (was: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?), Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Fernando Oleo Blanco, 2024/01/07