[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: outline-minor-mode: Did something change
|
From: |
T.V Raman |
|
Subject: |
Re: outline-minor-mode: Did something change |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:36:28 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
I' not disagreeing with you; what I was pointing out is that the HTML
Web rejected all notions of structured markup a long time ago, so hoping
that structure alone will give us something useful remains a dream --
one that I too dremt a long time ago
>>>> The new function shr-outline-search doesn't use outline-regexp.
>>>> It searches for the text property 'outline-level' that the function
>>>> 'shr-heading' puts on HTML headers. Then it makes outline headings
>>>> only on the lines with HTML headers. This is a more reliable way
>>>> than using a regexp.
>>>>
>>>> However, if you want to make outlines with a specific regexp
>>>> what you already did is the right way to do this.
>>>
>>> Using headers is the right idea an the regexp is a hack, but sadly
>>> the entire Web is a hack that forgot the meaning of structure a long,
>>> long time ago!
>>
>> Only think to add: could we have a half-way house solution that at least
>> for a while uses both ie outline-level and outline-regexp?
>
> outline-regexp is too unreliable: in eww need not to mismatch HTML headers,
> in emacs-lisp-mode not to match the open parenthesis in the docstring, etc.
> For the same reason tree-sitter is preferable to regexp-based font-lock.
--