Re: Code for cond*

[Stefan Monnier]

>    >    (cond-let
>    >      (:let var-for-rest value)
>    >
>    > Is there a reason why using a keyword here?
>
>    It was to "ensure" compatibility with existing `cond` code.
>
> I really hope we are not going to modify cond

Note how I used "was" above.  I'm just describing an idea I've had in
the past.  An idea I did not pursue.


        Stefan