[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the equivalent of `boundp' for lexical variables?
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: What's the equivalent of `boundp' for lexical variables? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:25:58 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Jan 26 2024, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> A symbol might have a lexical binding, it might not. The problem is how
> to test which one of these applies.
A lexical variable does not have a name, and a symbol cannot have a
lexical binding.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
Re: What's the equivalent of `boundp' for lexical variables?, tomas, 2024/01/27