Re: Installing cond* in core

[Po Lu]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> I see cond* as an alternative to pcase for those that prefer it.
> This is one consequence of deciding not to get rid of pcase.

[...]

> We didn't discuss that.  It sounds like a separate change from adding
> cond* to core, and I'm not sure it makes sense to commit to it off-hand,
> without first understanding the details.
>
> In general, there is no point to loading something early unless it is
> used early.  Do you have something more specific in mind?

With consideration to its role as an alternative to pcase, it's
reasonable to request that it not be placed at a disadvantage by not
being available at the same stage of the bootstrap process as pcase.