[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp` |
|
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jan 2024 08:12:56 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:00:49 -0500
>
> > Evasive non-answer number 1.
>
> That statement is mildly offensive.
I agree. Alan, please avoid such remarks. They add nothing to the
actual arguments, so these remarks are better dropped before sending,
to keep the discussion technical and constructive.
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/27
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/27
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/27
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/27
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/28
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/28
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/28
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/28
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Po Lu, 2024/01/27