[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp` |
|
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jan 2024 13:21:15 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> See, you're doing it again. I never said nor meant "CAN" be compiled, I
> meant code that one wishes not to compile, for purposes of debugging or
> understanding. Was that not clear?
No.
<PLONK>
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, (continued)
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/27
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/27
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/27
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/27
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/28
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/28
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/28
Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`, Po Lu, 2024/01/27