[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
pkg-autoloads.el vs. pkg-loaddefs.el
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
pkg-autoloads.el vs. pkg-loaddefs.el |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:56:29 +0000 |
Hello,
According to 43.1 Packaging Basics section of Elisp manual, package
autoloads are saved into pkg-autoloads.el file.
However, on master, there is also `generated-autoload-file' variable
that can override the file name where to write the autoloads. So,
pkg-autoloads.el is not always the file where autoloads are written.
Further, `elpaa-batch-generate-autoloads' in ELPA/admin/elpa-admin.el
hard-codes pkg-autoloads.el. And I got a report that in some Emacs
packages distributed through ELPA (org-mode, tramp, hyperbole), both
pkg-autoloads and pkg-loaddefs are generated.
Finally, all the libraries in Emacs core are using name-loaddefs.el.
I feel confused about where to use which name. There is apparent
inconsistency in the above facts.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- pkg-autoloads.el vs. pkg-loaddefs.el,
Ihor Radchenko <=