On 05/04/2024 12:39, Herman, Géza wrote:
What would be the best representation for numbers in this case?
I'm thinking about using symbols, but I'm not sure this is the
best approach. The parser/encoder would have a new keyword
parameter, like ":numbers-as-symbols t". If this is specified,
then
numbers wouldn't be parsed, but kept as symbols. What do you
think, is this a good approach?
Why not just use strings? Bignum implementations in various libs
(other languages) often use strings in constructors.