Re: Incorporate package macrostep into Emacs core

[Jeremy Bryant]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Jeremy Bryant <jb@jeremybryant.net>

>> >> Should the documentation for macrostep be included in the Emacs Lisp
>> >> manual section Macros?
>> >
>> > Yes, I think so.

For convenience, to recap from a month ago, this facility is about Lisp
macros, not keyboard macros.  macrostep is useful for Emacs Lisp macro
expansion or exploration, and development.


>> From: Jeremy Bryant <jb@jeremybryant.net>
>> * doc/lispref/macros.texi (Macros):
>> Describe macrostep's usage to explore and write macros.
>
> This is filled sub-optimally; please use change-log-mode to help you
> fill better.

Thank you for the pointer, I will use in future.

For this commit I have used magit-generate-changelog, is this suboptimal?

(..)

Thank you for all the comments on style, I will work on that.

(...)

> And finally, two more questions:
>
>   . should this be in the user manual instead? it sounds like a
>     user-level feature, not Lisp programming level feature

Sure, perhaps this is more suited.

I initially followed your confirmation to write in the Emacs Lisp manual
(top of this message), but indeed this may belong more appropriately in
the Emacs manual.  How about in "(emacs) Programs"?

Please confirm your preference either way and I'll continue the rewrite.

>   . how is this mode different from "C-x C-k SPC", which is already
>     described in the user manual as a similar feature?

Thanks, I'll be clearer in the next iteration. This facility is about
Lisp macros, not keyboard macros.  ('C-x C-k SPC runs the command
kmacro-step-edit-macro').  I'll improve the documentation in the next round.