Re: STatus of MPS branch

[Gerd Möllmann]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> Instead of disabling it, it would be better to have some way of making
> sure the finalizer works, even if that happens at some unspecified
> time.  Maybe make the test wait for that, or maybe MPS has a way of
> forcing GC to happen or something?

You're right, but there is a ton of other stuff to do, and I have to
prioritize somehow.

(BTW, instead of disabling the test, I provided a new feature "mps" and
gave the test an :expected result accordingly.)