Re: Building the igc branch on MS-Windows

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>,
>   eller.helmut@gmail.com,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:38:20 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > In any case, I asked about the downsides of calling igc_postmorten,
> > which I think is crucial to understand for making this decision.  If
> > there are no significant downsides, then doing so is a net win, no?
> 
> Isn't the downside that GC will never function again, and become unsafe
> to invoke, after a call to igc_postmortem?  With the result that the
> debuggee will not be usable as an editor, or indeed operate reliably at
> all, after bt is called?

Even if that is true, how does this matter after Emacs crashed?
Especially if that happened due to MPS assertion violation?