Re: Add seq-shuffle

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 20:44:16 -0500
> Cc: Emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
> 
> Thanks, this is a gap in functionality that should be filled.

Not every gap _should_ be filled, no.  Only those we think (and have
some basis to think) it is going to be missed by enough real-life Lisp
programs.

So saying "should be filled" without explaining why you think it
should be filled is less convincing than it could have been.  Thus, I
urge you to add motivation for your opinion.  TIA.